Find a Lawyer

MST. ZATOON versus SABIR HUSSAIN

Although the schedule suit for dissolution of marriage due to Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act 1993 Section 3 and Khulla Plaintiff (wife) did not raise Khalla's request specifically for her claimant, she was able to restore the marital rights filed by the defendant. In the cross-suit (the husband), the plaintiff in his written statement clearly indicated that it was impossible for him to remain with the defendant because he had incurred the hatred and because of the hatred against him. Khola was not requested from. Neither the plaintiff nor any case has been presented in this regard when the disclosure of facts in the application or by the evidence of the facts that came up during the course of the evidence, is a legal issue, which can be raised in the trial court or the appeal phase. Is. Without introducing any amendment to the pleadings and further evidence, except that Khulla could not be allowed to cancel the marriage without amending the application, as there was a mixed question of fact and law, the plaintiff (wife) Has caused severe hatred against the defendant (husband), it is quite clear that the spouses cannot live a harmonious life and according to their obligations the plaintiff has decided to marry another. Had a contract and gave birth to it. Living with five children makes it impossible for a spouse to live together; the trial court has rightly dissolved the marriage pakistani advocates Sohawa District Jelum lawyer