Find a Lawyer

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN (ZTBL) versus ALLAH YAR

Section 22 Appeal Decision Appealing Suit filed by Respondents / Plaintiffs without Appealing to Documentary Evidence In their favor, the Banking Court Appellant / Defendants claimed that the documentary evidence presented on the record was not examined or banking. Was done by the court. Minutes examining documents displayed by the banking court does not mean every evidence should be discussed and the decision should be based on evidence even though there is nothing in the appellant / defendant's retaliation. Was. / Plaintiffs had to prove their case on their case. In these cases the case was formally set aside, the case was remanded to the Banking Court to be directed to hear the decision after discussing every documentary evidence on record. \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• DUBAI ISLAMIC BANK PAKISTAN LIMITED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Defence 2013 CLD 2202
• KHALID HUSSAIN CHATHA v. MUHAMMAD USMAN alias NOMEE 2013 YLR 2209
• MUHAMMAD ZEESHAN ZARIF v. State 2013 YLR 2220
• KARAM ELLAHI BANDIAL v. RETURNING OFFICER PP-40, KHUSHAB-II 2013 YLR 2226
• MUHAMMAD ALTAF v. State 2013 YLR 2230
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2013 YLR 2237
• Raja ABDUL RASHEED v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION PEOPLES COLONY, FAISALABAD 2013 CLD 2250
• BABAR HUSSAIN v. State 2013 YLR 2251

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

advocates from Zahir Pir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes