Find a Lawyer

IQBAL & CO., FAISALABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Sales Tax Act 1990 Section 19 Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Section 9 CBR Letter No. 1 (6) STR / 98, Dated 18 7 2001 The Estimated Registration Survey Team Took stock of more than Rs. 10,000, 000 and sign and received the signature on the form. As a result of such assessment, the complainant was given a notice in which to register and turn over tax. Requires that the 2 Comp complainant / SCC object that the survey form was obtained by signature. The risks and assessments were unrealistic and inaccurate because the Income Tax Authority never over-estimated its value, in which the property case was submitted by the survey team to the decision of the Federal Tax Ombudsman in No. 582 of 2001, It is strange. Regarding such an order, the collector, in view of such a decision, had directed the Central Board of Revenue dated 19 19 7 2001 to prosecute the illegal. Revenue had issued a circular for its implementation, therefore, the previously issued circular was canceled and canceled. It's time to make the officers aware and aware of the decisions that have been made through the federal tax ombudsman and the federal taxation courts. The Ombudsman recommended that the assessment and evaluation made by the survey team and the signature obtained could not be construed as an agreement and that the complainant should be bound, especially as he or she protested. Had objected to. That if the relevant authority recommends taking stock and investigating, it is intended by the survey team. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Haveli Lakha lawyer