Find a Lawyer

JAMIL A. DURRANI versus THE STATE

Sections 497 and 369 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Sections 9, 18 (g) and 24 (b) Second bail application bail, the former bail plea filed by the accused was rejected by the High Court and the accused. In the case of some fresh grounds and subsequent developments, the request for a second bail was not applicable to the bail application, but a second or subsequent bail application must be filed. The trial against the principal accused of the prosecution was already withheld after some cases and proceedings in the case. The state had filed a review before the High Court, against which the verdict was pending, one of the accused was still absconding and the other co-accused was on interim pre-arrest bail which the High Court had approved. And the lawsuit was also banned from the Prima. The National Accountability Bureau officials adopted the CK and the election by not including the members of the Cantonment Board, because the accused, who issued a tender notice despite being banned by the Tie Government. What was alleged was that he had been in jail for more than nineteen months. And the trial was not in the near future The bail could not be stopped as bail and no one could be held in jail indefinitely. In case of bail approval, the accused was granted bail. divorce advocates from Quetta lawyer