WATER AND SANITATION AGENCY (WASA) EMPLOYEES WELFARE UNION (LDA) versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, LAHORE
Section 22 (10) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), Sections 20 (11) and 80 (2) of the General Clause Act (X9 of 1897), Section 6 collective bargaining representative for two years in 27 years 2000 Was confirmed as CBA. Under section 22 (10) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 26 10 2002 expired. 28 10 The application for the appointment of a new CBA made on 2002 was dismissed by the Registrar on the basis that the Industrial Relations Ordinance extended the period of two years to three years. , 2002, which came into force on 26 10 2002, such CBA shall not be construed as made under Ordinance 2002, as it is section 80 (2) (a), which is registered only with trade unions. Nor is it related to the CBA certificate. The respondent's order of certiorari as CBA was approved under Ordinance 2002 on the basis of section 80 (2) (b), which has a bearing on the former, which has resulted in General Claus. Section 6 of the Act contains the words. 1897 was only rescinded under section 80 (2) of the Ordinance 2002, to the extent that it did not withhold or contradict Article 6 of the Ordinance, Section 6 of the General Clause Act, 1897, considered itself to be The provisions will not apply, pursuant to section 20 (11) of the Ordinance, no application shall be made for the determination of CBA within the period of three years from the prohibited period of such certificate, therefore, under the ordinance. It was increased from two years to three years. , 2002, after the expiry of three years of the applicant's certification, can only move such application under Ordinance 2002 as the CBA High Court dismissed the appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Bunner lawyer