AKBAR ALI versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10, 11 and 16 of the Prohibition Code (XLV of 1860), Section 380 Bail), charged with forcible abduction of a woman In the FIR, the complainant initially contradicted the facts of the alleged wrongdoing between the accused and the alleged person / abductor, and the fact that the undercover woman allegedly took some jewelry and cash with her. The medical complaint document of the complainant's home on the allegations of rape bill did not show any signs of violence on any part of the woman's body. And the Chemical Examiner's positive report about the vaginal job of the aforesaid woman did not much benefit, as the prosecutor acknowledged that a married woman lived with her husband. The kidnapper had released her privately and she appeared before the Investigation Officer herself. No stolen rticle has been recovered from the suspect's arrest, with a woman in a rickshaw at a crowded place. Traveling, allegedly kidnapping himself under Section 160, CR in connection with the abduction or abduction of such a woman Does not refer to the statement of The record was recorded on the PC after a four-day delay after his private recovery, accusing the woman of adultery with her, only by the woman, who was charged under section 164, c. The RPC was traveling with the suspect and his accomplice. The accused and the mob were staying with them without raising alarm at the behavior of the woman (the victim).
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Chak 4 b c lawyer