Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus MST. NAEEMA IRSHAD

O VIII, R 10 The defendant could not file a written statement stopping the defendant's right to file a written statement because the plaintiff's trial did not provide him with a copy of the defendant's trial, as a last-minute case for filing a written statement. The hearing was adjourned to the date of adjournment. The plaintiff filed the petition, requesting that the plaintiff be directed to provide a copy of the case so that he could file a written statement so that the trial court rejected the petition filed by the defendant and the defendant wrote. The right to file a statement was terminated unless a special order for filing a written statement was approved. A written statement was postponed as a last resort because previous orders were routinely approved because the presiding officer was on leave or was on duty for three dates of the hearing, on any occasion the copy of the defendant was defendant. Ali was not handed over, although there is not always sufficient scope for the submission of a written statement, but the plaintiff was, to some extent, under his obligation to provide the defendant with a reasonable opportunity to file a copy of the written statement. Was not granted, the trial court approved, under which the defendant was required to file a written statement. He stopped right, was not sustainable in law, the defendant was to provide a further opportunity to enter a written statement. criminal advocate from Larkana lawyer