Find a Lawyer

HAJI JARO versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (a) / 504/34 Guarantees, the Grant accused were specifically mentioned in the FIR to the complainants with the respective captains. The defendant and other witnesses saw that when they arrived early, the site of the incident where the complainant's brother was found dead due to fire and hatchet injuries, his person had disclosed in the FIR There was old enmity between the parties, it was alleged that they were involved in the case due to enmity between the parties. It cannot be ruled out, but enmity was a two-pronged weapon that would end both ways, and it could be the motive of the accused who committed the crime and could be decided at trial because the accused's recovery. And even the medical report showed that the victim suffered fireworks injuries and hatchet injuries on his person. At the stage of the bailout, it cannot be said that the medical evidence confirmed the ocular evidence case. Did not Due to the fact that no further evidence was recorded, the trial court rightly rejected the accused's bail application immigration advocates phone number from Umer Kot lawyer