Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus MESSRS PROJECT TRADING & CO. HEAD OFFICE, LAHORE

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 16, 20 (a) (b) and OVII, R10 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 14 of the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals The petitioner's delay in return for the suit, filed by the court in L, objected to the defendant's objection on the ground that L's court had no jurisdiction to hear the case. The defendants filed a petition for return under Section 16, 20 and OVII, R 10, CPC. The plaintiff against the plaintiff alleges that the matter was from the District BN, the relevant site is located there and the cause of action was there, but the plaintiff erroneously set the suit on the LN which the BN Trial sought. It was necessary to send the civil court to the court. The said petition was rejected only because the plaintiff (Punjab province) was enforced through the secretary irrigation, whose offices were located in L without realizing that the role of the secretary irrigation in awarding works to the defendant. do not have. In the BN, the petition filed against the plaintiff against the issuance of the trial court orders was issued, which was located at the place where the plaintiff's work was performed and the cause of action for the dispatcher. But BN was also released in the matter. The court of L with L had no surveyor in this case, had no jurisdiction to hear the case. The trial court overlooked the fact that the government did not do any business in relation to its usual functions, nor did it live in a particular place nor advocates from Dhatmal lawyer