Find a Lawyer

PARVEEN QAMAR versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD

Special Savings Certificate Rules 1990 R14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 23, 24 and 199 Constitutional Application The Investor was revoked in the request to cancel the Special Savings Certificate (canceller) and issue the new certificate as the original certificate. The applicant, who was of foremost interest, purchased the Special Savings Certificate Listener), but was robbed and investors immediately notified the relevant National Savings Authorities of the incident and filed a criminal case in this regard. In this regard, the investor requested the authorities to cancel the certificate loot and the latest document Ugh. Issue of this certificate, its application was rejected pursuant to R14 (3) of the Special Savings Certificate Rules 1990, the special savings certificate rules on justification were not made under any legal authority on 1990 And could only be considered administrative. R14 (3) of the Special Savings Certificate Rules 1990 is also forbidden. Duplicate certificates and investor funds may not be entitled to claim duplicate certificates, but they are still entitled to profit. Claim the return on investment made by him, especially when the robbery certificate was not rejected by anyone. As they were conducting the investment made by the investors which was in the nature of trust with them, the authorities were obliged by law to return the investment amount with the profits earned under the scheme. Under this scheme, the successor will receive in the interest of the investors. Constitutional guarantees listed in Arts 23 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) advocate from Minchanabad lawyer