Find a Lawyer

SAMAR JABEEN versus THE SUB-DIVISIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER (FEMALE), KARACHI

Implementation of the Sindh Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 Rr 4, 5 & 8 Penalty required the signing of an inquiry charge sheet and the statement of accusation by the authorized officer who appointed the inquiry officer or inquiry committee. Were also authorized. An inquiry into the allegations of misconduct against the accused / public servant is a judicial process, before the inquiry officer or the inquiry committee, to present evidence before the inquiry committee, following the defense of the accused public employee, following the chief inquiry. 'S statement had to be recorded. Prosecution witnesses Both the prosecution and the defense have the right to examine the testimony of the other party when it is said that the process is being followed, the inquiry officer or the inquiry committee will determine whether the allegations are proven, unlawful. Or partially proved, upon receipt of the results of the inquiry, the authorized officer may take further action if a minor penalty is sought, then authorize him. The officer himself could award him, but if the officer authorized to pay a large fine If summoned, he will sue the authority along with all the records and the accused will pay a large sum of money to the civil servant. The proposal would suffer and to decide about the proposed penalties had authority. Self when you need a advocate from Shahdad Kot lawyer