Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD DIN versus THE STATE


Sections 23 (1) (a) (v) (f) (i) and 27 (4) of the Drugs Act 1976 (V9 1898), sections 243, 265 (e), 537 and 412 chairman and two members charged. Drug court was present while recording the offense of confinement and confession of the accused, not signing the decision by the other member, however, the confession of the accused was not declared illegal which is most understandable under Section 373737. Was. There was no prejudice as the decision was not signed by the CR PC Medicine Member and the charges were disclosed, clearly worded and recorded in their own words, Section 243, CR PC Or section 265 (e), CRPC not infringed by the trial court alleging that he confessed to the crime. Under this, the appeal and challenge of section 412, CRPC, were challenged. What they did not do was dismiss the charge of appeal

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Poonch lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.