Find a Lawyer

LT. (RETD.) MUHAMMAD SHABIR versus AZAD GOVERNMENT

Section & 42 and Writ 44 Written requests challenged in the notification regarding the transfer of the school from one village to another appellant who was a resident of school D, whereby the school was transferred to village M which was about 3 of. Was located at a distance of The petition, a kilometer away from the village De Wright, was rejected by the High Court Volatility School, which was in the village of D, which was located in a border area, and it was fully disclosed by the firing of the Indian forces and the small arms man in the village. Was within the limits of the school. For a long period of six years, after being properly located by the Indian firing authorities in large numbers for the welfare of the public, after having properly obtained certification with the consent of the masses in respect of proper place in the village. Off. M was transferred to a school which was not connected to the Indian shootings and not too far from Village D, where it was assisted by the Assistant Commissioner, after a spot inspection with the District Education Officer, through which he prepared a scalability / feasibility report. It was confirmed that the land in village M is suitable for the school unless the duties of the bead were charged and proved, the authorities are capable of transferring any school from one place to another. Given the unavoidable circumstances that existed when the village D was in front of the Indian shooting range and the school was closed for about six years, it was neither desirable nor a rational view that money was spent on the place. Where the school work is going. Had become virtually impossible, at the expense of public treasury and as a result online advocate from Adda Shaiwala lawyer