Find a Lawyer

LT. (RETD.) MUHAMMAD SHABIR versus AZAD GOVERNMENT

In the writ petitions 42 and 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974, the appellant was to move the school from one village to another where the school was a village D where a girls' school was initially built which was challenged in this notification. The school was shifted to Village M. The village was located about 3 kilometers from De Wright, which was rejected by the High Court's Waldetti School in response to a question in Village D, which was located in a border area and was completely destroyed by the firing of Indian forces. Was exposed. Heavy money approved in the public good after obtaining a suitable certificate with the consent of the public due to its location in the close range of Indian firing personnel for a long period of six years in the village of small arms in Village D In relation to the appropriate place in the closed village M where the school was moved to which the Indian shootings were not disclosed, D was not far from village D where it was transferred by the Assistant Commissioner to the Assistant Commissioner. Prepared after a Spot Inspection with the District Education Officer, which he confirmed As the land in the village M is suitable for the school, unless the duties of the bead are charged, the authorities are obliged to move any school from one place to another, given the adverse conditions. I was present that Village D was in front of the Indian shooting range and the school had been closed for about six years, neither required nor any rational way this money should be spent in a place where us immigration advocates from Mailsi lawyer