Find a Lawyer

CHIRAGH DIN versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE

The Special Relief Act, 1877, ordered a trial for the specific performance of the Section 12 suit sale agreement, but the appellate court dismissed the appeal in the same way that the plaintiff could not prove from any evidence that the alleged contract resulted. The suit property was handed over to me by the claimant. Nothing was on record to prove that the plaintiff owed the dues to the plaintiff, even though the minor witnesses and the author of the contract did not state the amount due to the plaintiff in his presence by the plaintiff. The dues were paid, which showed that the execution was executed despite the agreement, in which case the plaintiff failed to prove the execution of the contract, after the trial the appellate court remanded the remand. The trial court did not justify the dismissal, in which case the trial court's decision and the rejection of the injunction S after it was rightly rejected. In the absence of reading any false statement or evidence on record by the Appellate Court of Evidence on record, no interference with its decision and decree could be made when no illegal or material misconduct was established on the record. ? us immigration advocates from Upper Dir lawyer