Find a Lawyer

UNITED IMPEX, KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Complaint against the three duty withdrawal claims filed in 1995, 1997 and 1999, the return of Section 9 duty, the establishment of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, section 21 of the Customs Act 1969, was not received until March, 2002. Complaint, the department obtained fake documents from the complainant and immediately paid the original claim papers were not available to the department and did not respond to the complainant's personal efforts and the letters received by the authority collector. The feature did not provide any explanation for the wrong adjustment, unusual delays, failure to respond to the exporter's letters and the only excuse for the offer was about the recovery campaign, which was rejected by his own office letter, Such was the case of maliciousness due to obvious negligence, ignorance, inadequacy. And the failure to pay duties and how serious a complaint is being made The Federal Tax Ombudsman suggested that the Central Board of Revenue (i) appoint the Director General for inquiries and gross misconduct. Identify responsible officers and senior officers responsible for and (ii) initiate appropriate disciplinary proceedings. Against the people who pay the offender and the appropriate item criminal advocate from Washuk lawyer