MUBARAK ALI versus ALI MUHAMMAD
Section Spec Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 Transfer of land from a water course to another suit and permanent injunction, which settled on its Agricultural Land Water Course Nos. 17R and 19R Was transferred to his land water course number 18. R was intended to be signed by the owners of Water Course No. 18 on the basis of the statement of the Executive Engineer on the basis of the statement of alleged consent, that the petitioner's request before the Deputy Commissioner against such transfer was not a plausible hearing. Was dismissed for the reason, after the application was dismissed, a lawsuit was filed for the declaration. And the permanent injunction exemption was submitted that the statement of alleged consent was declared as fake and fake and the orders passed on the basis of voluntary statements by the Executive Engineer and the Deputy Commissioner were invalid, illegal and without jurisdiction. , But the appellate court ruled that the decision and order aside, the trial court's consent statement on the busi from which the land was transferred has been amended by sections 91 (1) and (1) of the Sindh Irrigation Act 1879. 2) did not meet the requirements and only after approval of the Legal Executive Engineer Water / Water Course change Water Course No. 18 can approve all creeks. Because many of the plaintiffs, including the plaintiffs, were neither taken notice of nor agreed to, the executive engineer's approval to change the water course was without jurisdiction, and the appellate court ruled on record. All content was ignored and processed illegally. Review by the High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Khuzdar lawyer