Find a Lawyer

DR. NAVEEDA TUFAIL versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Section 2 (i) (a) and 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 25 ad hoc appointment, Regulation of the principle of equality Applicants were appointed Lecturer by the Provincial Government despite appointment for several years. The government refused to regularize applicant positions, while similar appointments were formalized by the federal government. Applicants are of the view that regular restriction of these positions is in violation of the principles of equality as Article 25 of the Constitution states that applicants are employees of the provincial government. Claim to regulate rights in the light of federal government policy, but according to the principle of equality contained in Article 25 of the Constitution, it will demand that applicants be treated the same while the principle of equality should be treated as such. Be attracted to the right. Lecturers in the provincial government as they are ad hoc will stand in line with the federal government's ad hoc employees and it will be fair, fair and appropriate to consider the applicants 'issues for the sake of regularity in the applicants' minds. A legitimate expectation has been created. In keeping with their permanent sanctions, the Supreme Court directed the provincial government, while seeking guidance from the federal government's ad hoc regulatory scheme, to begin the process of regularizing applicants through the Provincial Public Service Commission. for the. Applicants were not found fit by Public Service Omissions, will not be retained in the service law firms from Warah lawyer