MUSHTAQ AHMAD, KHARIAN CANTT. versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Wealth Tax Act 1963 Section 16 Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Section 9CC was overseas, Wealth tax was imposed and the property was recovered from the bank account in connection with this house. Who was a son and son. There was no proper service prior to the notice in the law justifying the review by the assets, nor was there any material in the record to indicate how the property related to the property was attributed to the complainant. The Federal Tax Ombudsman suggested that the tax on wealth be reviewed. For the year 1995, the Commissioner 96 should be repealed under section 25 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, with the directive that a fresh inquiry be made specifically on the property of the property and if the complainant's owner was not found ? In this case the property action should be filed and the amount recovered from his bank account should be returned to him.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
