Find a Lawyer

HAJI MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

At the trial of Article 21L Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the trial court was initially satisfied with the guilty plea and the willful absence of the accused, but later satisfied on the basis of documentary evidence. That his fugitive was not deliberate, his plea was accepted and his sentence was set aside, which resulted in his trial, the trial court's trial court accused. Maintained the above sentence which was unapproved because the sentence was pronounced after the sentence and if the sentence was not stable. Again, the sentence cannot be allowed to remain, otherwise it will be presumed that the plea made by the accused on the grounds of non-attendance in the court was not received as an acceptable prosecutor and that the central case. I was unable to prove the charge against the accused. It could easily be pointed out that he was not included in the commission of the crime, as in his absence he is guilty of recording in terms of section 21. L of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 was also illegal, the application for leave to appeal was also consequently changed to an appeal and permission was granted and the unclean verdict was set aside. registration advocate from Mingora lawyer