Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MANSHA versus DR. MUNAWAR HUSSAIN

The Special Relief Act, 1877, Section 8 and 42 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872) declare section 226 and suit plates for its possession in connection with the same plot have claimed that the accused has been allotted the same to be procured by his lawyer. Owns the plot. The Plot Trial Court upheld both cases and dismissed the petition for declaration. The litigation appointed by the plaintiff has the power to sell the plot to the attorney before he resigns from his lawyer, making the application development authority according to his policy and selling the plot to the lawyer. Was. After receiving the approval of the site plan after the transfer of the claimant, the construction on the plot increased and the utility connection was obtained in the name of which the plaintiff became the owner of the plot. At that time the plaintiff's lawyer sold it through a power of attorney. Which has a clause on which it was authorized to sell. This plot and such sale was completed before the authority to revoke the High Court permit d. Appeals, putting aside unwanted decisions and orders, resulted in the trial of the statement filed by the plaintiff. The verdict was pronounced, while the case filed by the defendant was dropped. jobs for advocates from Kotli lawyer