MUHAMMAD IFTIKHAR versus DSTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FAISALABAD
Under the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000 Rr 39 (5) and 40 (6) Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 intra-court ruled by the Election Tribunal under the jurisdiction of the Election Tribunal. I ordered a record inspection. The counting of votes in the constitutional petition was withheld on the basis that the Election Tribunal has no jurisdiction to order such a constitutional application has been dismissed. After the trial was over, the parties found that its justification was sufficient. Considering the fact that the Election Tribunal did not have the power to order a re-counting of votes, it was ordered that the parties be present for scrutiny and re-counting of votes. Such power was accepted by the presiding officer. Under R40 (5) of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000, the doctrine of R39 (5) and the Returning Officer could not be denied to the Election Tribunal, which ruled that the election was invalid during the hearing of the election petition. Had given. Such authority belongs to the main jurisdiction of the Electoral Tribunal, and such authority cannot be denied or denied by the Electoral Tribunal. same as
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
