Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN EMPLOYEES UNION MALAKAND DIVISION (MARDAN DIVISION) versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, I, I, CHUNDRIGAR ROAD, HEAD OFFICE KARACHI


Sections 2 (xxvi), 3, 10 and 22 In the petition filed by the General Secretary of the Trade / Union registered for the applicants to determine the collective bargaining units in the EE Schedule, collectively for the applicant employees. Prayers were sought for the determination of bargaining units. The applicant of the establishment of the National Bank of Pakistan in the North-West Frontier Province claimed that because the defendant bank's regional office did not exist in the province because the bank had reorganized its management units, it was required. That the determination of new collective bargaining units should not be determined. The bank petitioning companies resisted alleging that the applicant received a registration certificate from illegal sources and that the petition against the registration of the applicant union was pending before the National Industrial Relations Commission Bench and that The National Industrial Relations Commission has no jurisdiction to maintain the application filed by the applicant. Even though a violation of the Petitoo Order was registered, its registration was not yet canceled, and even if the applicant's registration was canceled, the applicant union would retain the role of the unregistered trade union. As stated under the Ordinance's Industrial Relations, Section 2 (xxvi), 1969 and the applicant's determination to object to the collective bargaining units raised by the defendants in relation to the applicability of the union. In order to be able to transfer the application, it was rejected on the ground that the application was an industrial affair Reply

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Mir Ali lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.