Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD UMAR ALIAS UMRO versus THE STATE

Section 497 (5), 514 and 92 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13D bail of the Criminal Code (CRPC), which was granted by the High Court, was granted bail by reference to the High Court. I had granted him bail with Rs. 1,00,000, PR bond likewise for the satisfaction of the trial court ie the special court accused then fled and the special court made reference to cancel his bail. Sent to the High Court, in which both the High Court and the Sessions Court had the mutual jurisdiction to decide on the justification for the cancellation of the bail and their powers. The restrictions were not, however, demanded that the session court be in a better position to appreciate the facts and circumstances of the lower forum and pass the order where the session was exercised using the powers during the trial. The court ordered the arrest of a person under section 2 or 5144, which could be equivalent to the cancellation of the bail. If the court had explicitly mentioned it, however, if the arrest order was canceled or the court did not have the power to cancel the bail, the forum must have the denial of bail. In order to pass such orders, the Special Court is not required to exercise the powers of the session judge under section 497, CRPC and to refer the trial court's powers under Sections 514 and 92 CCPC. Yes, the reference is dealt with the above mentioned observations. top advocates from Kot Bunglow lawyer