Find a Lawyer

ITTEFAQ GINNING FACTORY, TOBA TEK SINGH versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Office of Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 50 (4), 80C, 143B, 52, 51, 86 and 156 Income Tax Rules, 1982, RR 49, 50 and 64A Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) , Sections 3 (2), 9 and 10 (4) Taxes deducted from the source tax deduction on supply by the Complainant / Assisi were neither deposited in the Government Treasury nor the deduction certificate complainant. Issuance of Income Tax Ordinance 1979 to Section 143B of the Income Tax Complainant / Assisi without issue of Invoice / Tax Deduction Certificate without source and tax deduction parties Fsylat associated with the full address to which it was demanded that the complainant / assysy Despite the official tax deduction. The fact is that proceedings were also initiated against the complainant for tax deduction and the demand was made by the tax recovery officer at gunpoint which instead of recovering the tax, the complainant was harassed, dishonored and hurt. Had arrived Withholding by the state from their agents but not deposited in the treasury required under the law, the justification was extremely troubling that despite detailed inquiries and recommendations in various complaints, senior officers at the regional and zonal level, along with the revenue division, All assets working under the legal obligation to act as tax withholding agents are deducted from time to time, collected tax and this tax has been collected and collected in accordance with the law. That they issued fixed certificates to those assessors from whom such taxes were deducted or deposited. And that they attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Swatmingora lawyer