RASOOL BUX versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 561 A Penal Code (XLV o; 1860), accused of compensating for section 302/34, was found innocent during a police investigation, but the police against keeping the accused, section 173 Report was submitted under CR PC! In column number 2 of the challan report, Hamm filed an application under section 265, CCPC, which was dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge, the High Court had earlier directed a writ petition in which the accused. 'S session was directed to appear before the court. The accused who moved the present petition had practically tried to review the order stating that the constitutional application which was not open for review order was not challenged before the Supreme Court, which was approved by the High Court. Even if it was said that the order of the High Court was temporary in nature but the order was issued that the accused should be cleared and tried before the court session was final and He was not open for review The High Court Trial Court decided the case on its merits at the end of the trial. Rana, Additional Sessions Judge's proportional order not to engage in any illegal activity, High Court dismisses the petition
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Bhara Kahu lawyer