Find a Lawyer

FAISAL ALI versus MESSRS SABRO REFRIGERATION AND AIR-CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT, S.A. BROTHERS (PRIVATE) LIMITED

Sections 15 and 22A (8) (g) National Industrial Relations, Commission (Procedures and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) Exemption from employment of employees by unfair labor practice The job was dismissed after the sheet was filed, alleging that he had beaten the admin manager at the factory gate, that the inquiry against the applicant was done in a fair manner and the conduct of the inquiry officer was above the board. There was no reason to deny the witnesses' testimony before the Inquiry Officer, disagreeing with the inquiry officer's finding. Because the applicant did not himself examine the eyewitness testimony of the incident but the applicant did not present his testimony before the inquiry officer, the petitioner claimed that he had full opportunity to prove his innocence. He has fallen victim to his trade union. Activities Although the petitioner was elected president of the union, he could not cite a particular institute for unfair practice and failed to produce any witnesses to support his claim, petitioner Failure to name the officer who allegedly pressurized / agreed to abandon his trade union activities could not be said in those circumstances. The applicant was subjected to irregularities by the employers under which the applicant referred in the disciplinary proceedings against him was meaningless as the National Industrial Relations Commission would only take power when it is disclosed. That committed unfair practice law firms from Mangal Sada lawyer