Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE versus KNOLL PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED

Section 25A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Petitioner was a Medical Representative of the Pharmaceutical Company and was dismissed because the applicant was saddened by his dismissal of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 of the Labor Court. The complaint was filed under Section 25A. The worker allowed the application and reinstated it with no benefits. The Labor Appellate Tribunal overturned and allowed the tire search of the applicant's Labor Court status, the appeal filed by the applicant by the applicant was that he carried the bag. Doctors used to go to doctors' clinics to contain drugs and promote the sale of medicines, so his appreciation was that he would take some medicine with me in a bag and present it to the doctors. introduces The applicant shall not change the status and status of the applicant under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, any part of one of the officers in the company under the standard jurisdiction of the Labor Court and the applicant shall The request could not be made and this request was rightly dismissed by the Labor Appellate Tribunal. best advocate from Tando Jam lawyer