UMAR AYUB KHAN versus RETURNING OFFICER NA-19, N.-W.F.P., DISTRICT HARIPUR/ADDITIONALDISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Representation of Section 8A of the People Act 1976 [inserted by Chief Executive Order No. 17 of 2002], 12, 14 (3) (5A) and 99 (1) (CC), with detailed numbers instead of bachelor's degrees File a certificate of There was no objection to the truth of the detailed marks certificate by the Returning Officer regarding the approval of the nomination papers, except that the bachelor's degree should have been offered instead of the detailed numbers, before the Tribunal the respondent had actually submitted the Bachelor's degree. Degree, which was certified by the relevant university law. The candidate should be a graduate. Such eligibility can be proved on the basis of the evidence to the satisfaction of the Returning Officer, which accepts or rejects the nomination on any of the grounds mentioned in section 14 of the Public Representation Act, 1976. Had the authority to do. Section 14 (3) (ii) of the Act empowers the candidate to resolve any defect in nomination papers under section 14 (5A) at the time of the scrutiny tribunal. The Act can hold material in order to arrive at a valid and fair result. Respondent, to be a graduate, was held, and was not incapable of doing so.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
