Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus MUHAMMAD UMAR ALIAS CHOTOO

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/324 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6, 7, 8, 19 (10) and 25 (4) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Articles 417, 439 and 561 In the absence, the litigation itself had asked the Anti-Terrorism Court to prosecute the accused in absentia, according to which the law prosecuted by the Anti-Terrorism Court accordingly. It cannot be urged that the trial court should now separate the accused's case from the other arrested persons. There should be no allegation against and against the accused and should be prosecuted for absenteeism as no evidence was available against him, under Section 19 (10) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. The case could have been prosecuted in absentia, the prosecutor did not present any material. Thus, before the trial court had granted the accused a sentence of conviction, his verdict was fully justified, so the verdict of the verdict was not easy for the exception to appeal. He was prosecuted. The ad was not successful in collecting any material against the accused and there was no evidence linking it to a crime for which it was challenged by the High Court to dismiss the appeal within the limits. power of attorney advocate Toru lawyer