YASIR ENTERPRISES THROUGH CH. BASHER AHMED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY
Sections 179 and 169 of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 265 K Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application to prevent import smuggling of imported goods seized the applicant's shipment, notice of the issuance was issued, as well as In connection with a smuggling, a criminal FIR was actually filed against the applicant's order which was passed against the applicant which was submitted by the Customs Appellate Tribunal on the basis that it too was under the Customs Act 1969 Violation of Section 179 (3). The proceedings against the applicant were dismissed, stating that the refusal to file a reference within the stipulated period had not been reached when the final applicant had been obtained, to terminate the FIR filed against him. Demand has been made while the department is of the view that the applicant has an alternative alternative. Under the CRPC of section 265, therefore unable to retain the constitutional petition when any relevance and utility in the showcase notice was exhausted, it cannot be expected that the criminal court, on the same facts and material, CCP Action under section 265K of the C can be suppressed only if the invoice was pending. And the trial began. Since the trial had not yet begun, the trial court had no opportunity to indict, therefore, it cannot be said that Section 265 of the CCPC for the applicant. Treatment was available under Needless, sending the applicant to trial is a delusion and this case was appropriate and appropriate for the High Court to exercise its constitutional jurisdiction.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
