Find a Lawyer

DILSHAD HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 464 (XLV of 1860), Section 295B In case of non-compliance with the accused's insanity, the trial magistrate relied on the medical certificate issued by the medical superintendent. The accused was granted bail but did not adopt the procedure prescribed under Chap XX IV of the CCP Convention that no person brought this legal clause to the trial magistrate's notice during the trial. Was because the trial magistrates themselves were expected to be aware of the law. During the trial, the accused or his lawyer did not request that the accused be unfounded and as a result he was unable to defend himself. The accused, in cross-examination, replied that he was alright and that Insanity was not considered appropriate though it was. He had suffered some mental illness and was undergoing treatment, there was nothing on record that the accused was not able to make during the trial, more than 12 years after the incident. However, based on the evidence on record for the re-decision of the case, it was found appropriate to decide the case; only the evidence was available to the prosecutor. Extra judicial confessions before the prosecution's witnesses stated that the witnesses said they did not see the accused throwing a copy of the Koran in the stream, which was another reason for not remanding the case to the trial court because it If so, the only evidence that a prosecutor can reproduce is `` Extra-judicial confession '' if the trial court determined advocates from Leepa lawyer