Find a Lawyer

SOCIETY OIL DEALERS, KARACHI versus DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI

Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 (vii) and 2 (f) Civil Procedure Code (V8 of 1908), O VIII, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Proof of Requirements for Use of Personal Exploitation I was under oath and it was examined that the petitioner filed his written statement and affidavit evidence, but did not appear in the testimony, the Rent Controller dismissed the defense request on the ground that the defendant was the owner and The tenant relationship did not exist. And the petition for eviction by the plaintiff was a desperate attempt to evict the applicant because the petition filed by his brother against the applicant was dismissed in which the appellate court appealed to the defendant. Was accepted and started a search for the rent control agency by mistake. On the basis of separation by the petitioner's brother, after filing a written statement and making an affidavit in the evidence, the witness appeared to have failed / failed to appear in the witness box, thus, on the basis of such written statement Failure to defend itself before the Court of Defense In this regard, no question was raised by any of the respondents regarding its status as a landlord or owner, no evidence was misinterpreted. The appeal court's finding was in accordance with the laws and principles laid down by the Supreme Court High Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction. Neither can interfere with such matters nor determine the status of the respondents, as a matter of fact, as stated in Section 2 (f) of the Word Homeowner Centre Ranked Premises Ordinance, 1979, pakistani advocates Malakwal lawyer