Find a Lawyer

JAMAL KHAN versus THE STATE

The ballistic expert was found to have been convicted of the crime at the site of the assassination of Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b), 302 (c), 396, 392 and 353 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance X 1965), Section 13D. The pistol, tired of the rifle, had confirmed each other from the possession of the prosecution witnesses, who had no independent testimony to falsely accuse the accused of the facts and circumstances of the robbery until the arrest and recovery of the accused. They had been convicted by the weapons of the crime that they had committed robbery in the coach by four men with a common motive, and the subsequent conviction of the police constable by the accused was a true and voluntary offense, and even though it was withdrawn. ? All material details are supported and corroborated by other evidence on record, and as such, it can be safely relied upon for the prosecution of the accused PR. In this way, the unlawful proceedings proved their case against the accused without any doubt, Section 396, PPC is not enforceable in this case, under which the accused were convicted and the sentence was set aside. Punishments and punishments were retained with the necessary amendments. ask a advocate free from Tando Allahyar lawyer