Find a Lawyer

ABDUL JAMIL versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR/COLLECTOR, SWABI DISTRICT

Sections 4, 6 and 23 (2) Land Acquisition Compensation The contention of the landlord's legitimate assessment was that the acquisition of the land was not appropriate in determining the collector's value as it was located near the village population and was intended for private purpose. Could be used. Construction; that the owners purchased the land at a higher price in 1986 and that the real estate acquired under Section 23 (2), Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was not for public purpose. The plaintiff testified that he purchased the suit for construction at a higher cost, but neither proved the relevant mutation nor was the party involved in the transaction. The testimony of the witnesses without any supporting evidence in support of their asserted claim would be unconfirmed. The evidence was on the landowners that the production of this mutation could be overstated by the production of either party. Evidence of the important nature of religion was given. It was completely inadequate for the purpose of the landlords where there was no evidence that there was any population near the receiving lane. d, There was no electricity, connection or water scheme or any source of water which was necessary for the purpose of the property for construction, the dispute of the landlords that the value of the land was illegally fixed could not be accepted. Is. best law firms from Zahir Pir lawyer