Find a Lawyer

SHAMAS-UD-DIN KHAWAJA versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

The Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973 Rr 6, 5 and 4 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 mandatory retirement inquiry is to conduct a full inquiry under which the authorized officer is charged and charged. Will need to be notified. Government employees have clearly defined R6 (1) (2) of the above-mentioned accusations, Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973 that the accused officer has less than 7 days or more than 14 days. Will not be provided until. Presenting your defense, oral or documentary evidence, and reviewing witnesses against it may also constitute a fact-finding procedure against a public servant under the rules set forth in R6 (1) (2). can not be. ) ()) The conviction and credible evidence of the Roll of Ample is to be kept on the record, which can be used to secure the allegation against the public servant safely and only then the search for the necessary retirement can be retrieved. When the department proceedings were initiated on the basis of criminal charges only, which were not later proved by the competent law court and consequently acquitted, then the mandatory retirement order from the department. The order of the retaining service tribunal was set aside by the Supreme Court. The court immigration advocate from Hattian lawyer