Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH versus THE STATE

Section 514 of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), sections 420/468/471 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (III of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the bail bond in favor of the charges of confiscation of bail Occupied if not. Under Section 14514, a case was filed for the arrest of the surety bond in the court officials for the submission of the bond accused, CCPC was that as soon as the accused was absent in violation of the bond executed by him. Or, guaranteed, the court took the first step. It had to convince itself that the accused had violated the terms and conditions of the bond and if the bond was alleged to have been confiscated, the court would record the reasons and approve the order of confiscation by the court. It was to demand a bound person. The third action to be taken by the court is a summary action to pay the bond, or to show why the penalty should not be paid. Have to investigate. And record the reasons why its explanation should, or should not, comply with the provisions of section 141414, mandatory in the nature of the PC, its non-compliance with the order to seize the bond illegally. One of the disqualifications for which the bail bonds were banned would be found. Moving without the help of auxiliary and other accused was an 85-year-old woman, neither was the accused's absence appearing deliberately on the court date, nor was the court confiscating the bail, Adopted the mandatory procedures set out in Section 1414, Cr immigration advocates from Samundri lawyer