ABDUL KHALIQ versus IRSHAD ULLAH KHAN SIAL, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE
Code of Conduct 1908 Section 91 and O VII, R 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Rejection Plaintiffs Public Street The plaintiff asserts that the disputed street is called his personal property by the plaintiff's claims. The plaintiff objected and apply the same thing as AO VII, R 11, as a public road, the CPC was filed by the defendant on the basis that the plaintiff's rejection was made under section under91 No required permissions. The CPC had erroneously observed the plaintiff's dismissal of the petition by the plaintiff, both of the following courts rejecting the review, which contained the necessary evidence to prove whether the street was public or Private and he further observed that the plaintiff claimed a right of relaxation and necessity the Such observations by the appellate court were the result of a misinterpretation of the record. Plaintiff said the street is a public street and there was no incident of relaxation by prescription or in any way because the plaintiff had not charged anyone. Special damages, the orders passed by the following courts were passed without legal authority and were set aside which were rejected by the High Court plaintiff in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
