Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMJAD, MESSRS RAWALPINDI METAL CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD., RAWALPINDI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

The Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 52, 86, 50 (7A) and 50 (4) constitute the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 of XXV), Section 9 additional to any person on tax deduction or failure to pay The taxpayer's tax was deducted under section 50 (7A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and did not reduce the tax under section 50 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 on payment of his purchase. Was gone That the assessee company should have been deducted in tax under section 50 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 when paying for the purchase of the scrap because the purchases could not be excluded under section 50 (7A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. Was. In section 50 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, Assisi requested that since the seller / payer had already paid tax on the transaction in this case, the assessee had to pay the buyer / prayer in accordance with the fixed endorsement. The reviewer cannot understand that the complainant / assessee violated section 50 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 by not deducting tax on payment to the supplier and the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. Made it liable for action under section 86 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman. (i) Additional tax under section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, applicable from the date of payment from the date of payment of the purchase of the scrap made by the complainant till the date in respect of the said transaction is taxed. And (ii) if the additional tax is inconsistent with the amount of tax received by the examining officer as may be required to the extent it may be amended. when you need a advocate from Shangla lawyer