Find a Lawyer

RAO TARIQ MEHMOOD versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Article 8D (2) (O) and (G) of the Representative People Act (LXXV of 1976), sections 14 (5A) and 14 (3) (C) of the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) Conduct of Election Order 7), Sections 114, 151 and O XLVII, R1 Under the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court of Review, the candidate for nomination of the Provincial Assembly was rejected on the basis of defaulting on the bank, the papers were rejected. The High Court's decision to reject the nomination was reviewed on the basis that the documents associated with the revision application were not available to the candidate at the time the papers were submitted, except the nomination papers. In the meantime, it was clearly revealed that the candidate had retired from the company directorship which had defaulted and transferred the entire shareholding of the said company and the candidate and other shareholders settled the dispute with the bank candidate. , It asserted that the High Court had sufficient jurisdiction to look into the arrangements for restitution of outstanding dues with the said bankruptcy, especially with the bank, because of the candidate's own total The shareholder was transferred. As was emphasized, under this decree, it did not discharge it from its obligation which the candidates, pursuant to section 14 (5A), passed against themselves and others under the authority of their representative. Under the decree made, a bank was in debt. , 1976 was read with section 14 (3) (c), which the candidate had to show that he was not incapable of any disqualification on the date of nomination as a candidate, for review in the petition. Try best advocate from Sanghar lawyer