DR. KHALIDA PERVEZ versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Land and Buildings of the Central Government (Recovery) Ordinance 1965 Section 5 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Retaining the Constitution Petition Shukase Notice Applicant's complaint that the government had seized the property was that he was the clear owner of the bungalow. Under Section 5 (2) of the Central Government Land and Buildings (Recovery) Ordinance, 1968, the federal government was reconstituted after spending huge sums of money, and in the constitutional petition the wires of the notice were stopped. The constitutional petition is in turmoil which may cause the show cause notice to be heard. Applicants are in favor of filing a response to the notice and raising all legal and factual requests and the authorities to consider the matter and take jurisdiction. Obligation to pass speech orders with. The petitioner raised all objections to the jurisdiction of the powers, suggesting the matter involved in this matter in view of the controversial issues related to the High Court, facts and section 5 of the Central Government's Land and Buildings (Recovery) Ordinance, 1968. 2) Raise all the objections before the authorities against maintaining proceedings or issuing notices under. And directed that the authorities decide the matter after giving the applicant an opportunity of hearing as per the law regarding its merits.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Kotla Jam lawyer