Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ATTA MUHAMMAD versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE/CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LAHORE


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 190 and 1993 The decision of the constitutional petition is based on a decision in personal jurisdiction, and in other cases, for example presented by the Supreme Court, to follow a decision passed by the Supreme Court of the United States. Refused. The decisions applied to the parties were the authority of which the legal utility of the decision in the personal status of those who obey and make decisions cannot be construed by the parties and cannot be ignored. In other instances, the authorities were obliged to comply with and comply with the directions of the Supreme Court, which were bound by Article 190 of the Constitution. The High Court directed the authorities to follow the directions of the Supreme Court and decide the applicant's claim. Accordingly the request was disposed of

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Talamba lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.