Find a Lawyer

MST. SHEREEN GUL versus JAMEEL AHMED PARACHA

Sections 12 and 54 for the specific performance of the sale and injunction prohibition, at the time of sale, the House Building Finance Corporation had a mortgage, the sale agreement was made between the plaintiff and the plaintiff's original owner's attorney, Was the husband of The power of attorney was hanged in the in in was in favor of the lawyer of the attorney, while it was said that the power of attorney hired the power of attorney in 1994, ie ten years after his lawyer. The plaintiff's defense specifically stated in its written statement that the power of attorney was executed in favor of her husband only for the management of the property and that he had no absolute authority to sell the suit house and the plaintiff. A sale agreement was reached between K's lawyer, who declared himself the result of a lawyer's misrepresentation. By becoming the sole owner of the suit house and asserting that the contract was executed as a sole proprietorship, the question cannot be imposed on the defendant in the capacity of attorney Sail Egger and the enforcement of the said agreement. At the time the plaintiff should have considered the documents entitled Suit House to show that the lawyer had the option to sell the suit house or that such powers were granted to the defendant / real owner against the trial court. I had a legal obligation to protect the interests of the defendant, the hanging lady suithouse who would otherwise be living The property was not in the name of the lawyer / defendant's husband, the lawyer was not eligible to enter the sale contract with the plaintiff in his personal capacity, at the time of filing a lawsuit, knowing that the suit was jobs for advocates from Kalar Syedian lawyer