Find a Lawyer

DAD REHMAN versus SHAKEELA

Family Court Rules of 1965 RR 6, 7 (1) and 9 Guardians and Wards Act (VIII 1890), Sections 25 and 47 (c) of the West Pakistan Family Court Appeal for the custody of the District Judge Appeal for the custody of a minor was filed directly before the District Judge before recording the evidence of the cases from the District Judge's Court to the Civil Judge / Family Court Court before submitting as And in that case it was decided in favor of the minor puppy taken by his mother's mother. The minor was that the evidence already recorded by the District Judge was properly recorded and can be read by a Civil Judge / Family Court if it is transferred to the Court. Delivery was a jurisdiction under Judge R7 (1). Under the West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965, a civil judge's court has not been set up in any district for recreation, hearing and trial of a suitable hearing under the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964. Was established in Ouj district, which was granted jurisdiction under R6 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965, the only court that was capable of entertaining, hearing and hearing a case / petition for juvenile detention. Not in the district court in which this application was filed, the proceedings conducted by the District Judge in the present case were to some extent illegal, including the order of detention of a minor approved by a District Judge. And there was action in front of the district with no jurisdiction. Lack of court jurisdiction over judge pakistani advocates Piaro goth lawyer