Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus THE STATE


Section 365 Terrorism Activities Pressure (Special Courts) Act (X of 1975), Section 2 and Schedule Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6, 38 and 39B [such as the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Ordinance ( Filed through XXXXX of 2001)]] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The constitutional plea case against the accused in section (a) and (e) of section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 Which was included in the definition of terrorism, which, if proved guilty by the Anti-Terrorism Court, would be subject to the law provided by the law, if it was found guilty, Was committed before the commencement of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the accused was ordered to be tried under the meaning of Section 38 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. Moved to court, the constitutional application was accepted accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Sangote lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.