GHULAM MUSTAFA SHAH ALIAS PAPA versus THE STATE
Sections 497 and 439 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860); Section 2302 / Ju 34 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (2000 Section XX of XXII); Was turned into a daily diary report with the defendant's intention to be included as a partner. After the commission of the crime for the murder of the accused and the supply of the port, his judicial confession of the accompanying accused report was not fully supported; no evidence linking the accused to the crime was available on record. The prosecution can testify. The co-accused was even a minor bail, in which case the accused was allowed when, according to the documents produced on the record, he was alleged to be under the age of eighteen and was only allowed under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000. Only a court formed can stand trial. As a result, the prosecutor was instructed to present the accused's case in the Syed court and accordingly he was cleared.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Kashmore lawyer
