Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus GHULAM ROQUIA

Court Fees Act 1870 Section 7 (V) (C) and First Schedule Article 1 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 100, 114, OX, R14 and XLVIII, R1 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act (IX of 1991), In the Section 5 pre-emption suit, the order was approved by the appellate court, the regular second appeal consisted of a reduction in the sale price of the premier's prayer sale at Rs, 000, Rs, Rs. Until a certain date, 000 65, pay a fee of Rs. , Before which the appeal will be proved, the High Court will be dismissed if the ruling does not comply with this order. The pre-emptor sought to modify such dismissal order on the basis that the court fees had to be paid according to the price set out in section 7 (v). The validity of the Court Fees Act, 1870, where the pre-emption decree itself was challenged or claimed, then in the present case, section 7 (v) of the pre-emptor of the Court Fees Act 1870 Under this case or appeal was to be valued. There is no order claim for possession, but it was already approved by such appellate court, before the pre-emptor's claim was reduced to Rs 65,000 in the sale price, Cannot be relieved under Section 7 (v) of the Court Fees Act, 1870, demanding reduction of the amount of data by a particular such advertisement wallorem court under Article 1 of the First Schedule of the Court Fees Act, 1870 There was a charge to pay the fee, no case was made to review the unknown decision, the High Court dismissed the request for a review. immigration advocates from Jamshoro lawyer