Find a Lawyer

QAZI MUHAMMAD SAQIB KHAN versus GHULAM ABBAS

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Laws in Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 17 and 79 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 2 (b) The specific performance suit of the original vendor sale contract verbally disputes the plaintiff. Agreed to sell, but his father later executed a written agreement in favor of the plaintiff. No one received the trial court's claim that the original owner had received a substantial sum of money from the plaintiff, such an oral contract did not fall within the definition of section 2 (b) of the Contract Act, 1872. The plaintiff and his witnesses admitted in cross-examination that the father of the original owner did not usually present a power of attorney at the time of the execution of the sale agreement because the plaintiff had not signed such a written agreement. In the view of the plaintiff was bound. In presenting two witnesses in accordance with Laws 17 and 79 of the testimony, the plaintiff of 1984 failed to prove that an oral or written contract was in the process of being properly executed between the original seller and his father. The High Court dismissed the appeal for lack of eligibility. list of advocates from Gharo lawyer