Find a Lawyer

AHMAD JAUHARABAD (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE-DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 103 Formation of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance Office (XXXV of 2000V), ss 9 and 10 (4) In some cases the Complaint / Complainant has claimed that the Assessment has been prevented. Following the decision of the First Appellate Authority to prevent the return of the officer's proposal, the complainant was concerned with the doctrine of deprivation of a valid claim for refund and if he feared that his assets would be lost and Returns can be stopped in this case even after recovery is impossible. If the Court of Appeal against this order would eventually make the refund successful, the complainant was a private limited company with a large number of capital and fixed assets, and there was no fear that the property would be inspected. Will disappear upon receipt of the promise of return. From the facts and disputes of the parties, it was clear that the department had earlier filed an appeal with the Central Board of Revenue, the tribunal and the matter was decided at all times to terminate any claim or refund. And other contentious issues were appealed without merit to avoid the responsibility of the decision. The Central Tax Ombudsman has decided to investigate the matter and decide whether the department is justified in filing the appeal and before 15 2002 2002 before the complaint / case is closed. Is. By the Federal Tax Ombudsman law firms from Shikarpur lawyer