Find a Lawyer

QAISER KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 6 and 7 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), jurisdiction of section 324/34 of the Anti-Terrorism Court, 340/34 of the cause of the charges against the accused under section 324/34 of the cause The transfer court accepted it without stating. Irrespective of whether the crime is linked to terrorism or whether the crime was under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the special court held that the trial court had ruled that the case had been committed. There was no case, terrorism involved and there was no nexus with the objection of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 as the case was not registered under Section 7 (c) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 nor was the case mentioned above. Investigations were not made under the provisions nor asked to furnish the challan. By prosecution, the court was a simple case under section 324, PPC, in which the crime was not committed in a manner that would have led to terrorism or a feeling of intimidation. Except for insecurity in people or in a part of the public, except for the general sense of guilt that is the feeling of insecurity that arises at the time of the commission of every crime convicted by a judge's anti-terrorism court, Criminal justice was not in accordance with the laws and principles of Islamic distribution. The decision of the Special Court was set aside and the case was remanded to the Special Judge with the direction of the Additional Sessions Judge to be sent to the court, which will be decided strictly in accordance with the law. best law firms from Phalia lawyer